Re: Deprecate TLS1.0 support in emacs

[Stefan Monnier]

> IMHO, this replacement is OK only if the message has buttons to take the
> appropriate actions (including silencing warnings as needed).  Otherwise
> it's noise users will filter out.

I generally agree on the principle, but at the same time I wonder what
actions would make sense: there are basically 2 applicable actions, one
of which (contact the webmaster to suggest upgrading to a better
protocol) is difficult to automate.

As for the other action (silence the warning) I wonder if it's really
needed: if the mechanism is discreet enough, it's just as easy for the
user to "filter it out as noise".


        Stefan