Re: Licence of ts-comint

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:35:14 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> SM> I don't know what is the current maintainers's opinion about include
> SM> support for LLVM/LLDB/... into Emacs. I'm personally have no issue with
> SM> it.
> 
> I have no issue with it, either. I think allowing Emacs to interoperate with
> other systems extends its reach, which in the end is more helpful, than shying
> from the possibility that someone might then prefer to use LLDB over GDB. I
> prefer to let the programmer use what he wants to use with Emacs.

I prefer to wait until LLDB implements a decent emulation of the MI
protocol, then we don't have to do anything to support it.  GUD is the
obsolescent interface, modern debugging should use MI.