[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Summary and next steps for (package-initialize)

From: Clément Pit-Claudel
Subject: Re: Summary and next steps for (package-initialize)
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 23:01:07 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 2017-08-22 20:09, Radon Rosborough wrote:
> Well, nobody (including you) has told me *why* they don't like my
> proposal. If somebody would explain that, then I would stop bringing
> it up.

I think I'm not a big fan of your proposal because the only problem I see with 
the status quo is that a call to package-initialize in the init file is 
required at all.  Given this, I don't see a change to the status quo that still 
requires a call to package-initialize in init.el as an improvement.

I think your proposal is well-designed and reasonable, and I think you made a 
good case for it, but it solves a problem that I don't see as a problem, and it 
doesn't solve the part that I'm bothered about.

I hope this makes sense!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]