[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2017 06:40:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> You've said that "not copyleft" usually implies "don't say free
> software" and "say free software" usually implies "copyleft". Those
> two statements are equivalent.
Almost. Except that I said "promote not copyleft" usually implies
"don't say free software" and "say free software" usually implies
"promote copyleft", so the negation is not quite at the right place to
make one the contrapositive of the other.
> But the converse is not true. There are companies that don't
> particularly care about freedom, and don't say "free software", but do
> release code under the GNU GPL as part of their business model.
Indeed, my statement doesn't intend to cover all cases.
Stefan
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, (continued)
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/22
- [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/22
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Radon Rosborough, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/22