[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should mode commands be idempotent?
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should mode commands be idempotent? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Oct 2017 19:10:37 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/26.0 (darwin) |
>>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> address@hidden
>> +Calling the major mode command twice in direct succession should not
>> +fail and should do the same thing as calling the command only once.
SM> I think I'd prefer it if the word "idempotent" was mentioned (not
SM> *instead* of what you have, but additionally).
SM> Other than that: LGTM.
Same.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2