[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: About the removal of pinentry.el |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:16:54 +0100 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> It's okay, but I'd prefer not to remove the paragraph that explained
> why the package was removed. Without it the removal sounds rather
> arbitrary.
It does say that epa-pinentry-mode can now be set to loopback in which
case pinentry.el is not needed anymore for epa to use Emacs' minibuffer
to prompt for passphrases.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, (continued)
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Daiki Ueno, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/09
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, John Wiegley, 2018/01/10
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Matthew Carter, 2018/01/12
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Nicolas Petton, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el,
Nicolas Petton <=
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/16
- Re: About the removal of pinentry.el, Filipp Gunbin, 2018/01/17