[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Three cheers for Eli!
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Three cheers for Eli! |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jun 2018 17:58:05 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:32:54 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > > The term "inclusive development projects" might fit your concept.
> > > Or "community-contribution software projects".
> > >
>
> > Neither suggestion rolls off my tongue. How about "community-based"?
>
> That term has various possible interpretations, and some of them do
> not fit GNU Emacs. People might take it to imply a project that is
> independent and run by whoever participates. That is not how a GNU
> package works.
Maybe I'm missing something: is there a problem to say "free software
and open-source projects"? There's no doubt open-source projects do
exist, it's just that GNU projects are not among them. But if someone
wants to name them all collectively, where's the problem in that?
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/06/01
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, John Yates, 2018/06/01
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Richard Stallman, 2018/06/01
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, John Yates, 2018/06/02
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Richard Stallman, 2018/06/02
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Richard Stallman, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Amin Bandali, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Van L, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/06/04
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/06/07
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, João Távora, 2018/06/07
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/06/10
- Re: Three cheers for Eli!, Joshua Branson, 2018/06/11