[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is .ml associated with lisp-mode in auto-mode-alist?
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: Why is .ml associated with lisp-mode in auto-mode-alist? |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:08:43 -0400 |
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 13:55:10 -0700 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> > GNU Emacs did support Mocklisp (by translation and emulation) for
> > a few years in the 1980s. I hope and expect nobody uses it any
> > more.
>
> Yes, it would be helpful if .ml were to default to a mode useful
> for editing ML code. I think the most commonly-used Elisp code for
> that is Tuareg Mode, which is GPL'ed; how about if we default to
> that? See:
>
> https://github.com/ocaml/tuareg
>
I believe that the bulk of people who edit files ending in .ml are
using Tuareg mode for it (that is to say, I believe that OCaml is
more popular than SML, and that Tuareg mode is the usually used mode
for that.)
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Why is .ml associated with lisp-mode in auto-mode-alist?,
Perry E. Metzger <=