emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bignum branch

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: bignum branch
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:18:53 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) 
>> For example, (eql 0.0e+NaN -0.0e+NaN) now returns t
>> because the two NaNs have different signs; formerly it returned nil.
> Should this be the other way around ?

You mean it's (eql -0.0e+NaN 0.0e+NaN) which should return t?
Shouldn't `eql` be commutative?


        Stefan "confusion is power"
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]