|
From: | João Távora |
Subject: | Re: master f96fe57: New option to make 'C-x 4 a' use file-less ChangeLog buffers |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:18:25 +0100 |
It has create, but it also has 'dont'. I guess I can see how it makesEli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
>> Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
>> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 12:16:48 +0200
>> Cc: João Távora <address@hidden>
>>
>> address@hidden (João Távora) writes:
>>
>> > +your program and keep a change log. In these situations, you may not
>> > +want to keep a separate versioned change log file. If
>> > address@hiddenngelog-file} is address@hidden, commands
>> > +like @kbd{C-x 4 a} (@code{add-change-log-entry-other-window}) will
>> > +record changes in a suitably named temporary buffer instead of a file,
>> > +unless such a file already exists.
>>
>> So if add-log-dont-create-changelog-file is t, but ChangeLog exists as
>> a file on disk, the entry goes there and not in the non-file ChangeLog
>> buffer?
>
> Yes.
>
>> That would be surprising to me.
>
> Why surprising? First, this is the current behavior, so this way we
> are less incompatible; and second, that's why the option has "create"
> in its name.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something.
sense if you already have a ChangeLog file lying around.
Anyway, I donʼt think I feel strongly enough about this to suggest a
change.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |