[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum
|
From: |
Andy Moreton |
|
Subject: |
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:06:48 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) |
On Tue 24 Jul 2018, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jul 23 2018, Andy Moreton <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Also, if the width is specified as 8 I expect to see 8 digits of output,
>> not 6.
>
> The width specifies the field width, not the number of digits.
Good point. "(format "%#0.8x" 1)" behaves as expected.
AndyM
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Helmut Eller, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andreas Schwab, 2018/07/24
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum,
Andy Moreton <=
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/21