|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: documentation of integers, fixnums and bignums |
Date: | Sat, 8 Sep 2018 16:37:26 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
encode-char could potentially return a value that cannot be represented as a fixnum.Can this still happen? When?When INDEX_TO_CODE_POINT returns a code point greater than most-positive-fixnum, which can happen (in theory, at least) on 32-bit platforms.Can it, really?
I don't know of any way it could happen. So what you're saying is that we should install something like the attached patch?
Also, how about glyph-ids returned by font-variation-glyphs? Can they exceed fixnum range? If not, font-variation-glyphs could see a similar speedup.
encode-char.diff
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |