[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:09:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Paul Eggert) writes:
Hi Paul,
> Remove some assumptions about timestamp format
>
> These changes remove some assumptions of Lisp code on timestamp
> format. Although we’re not going to change the default format any
> time soon, I went looking for code that was too intimate about
> details of timestamp format and removed assumptions where this was
> easy to do with current Emacs primitives.
> * test/lisp/calendar/parse-time-tests.el (parse-time-tests):
> * test/lisp/emacs-lisp/timer-tests.el (timer-test-multiple-of-time):
> * test/lisp/net/tramp-tests.el:
> (tramp-test19-directory-files-and-attributes)
> (tramp-test22-file-times, tramp-test23-visited-file-modtime):
> Don’t assume detailed format of returned Lisp timestamps.
> diff --git a/test/lisp/net/tramp-tests.el b/test/lisp/net/tramp-tests.el
> index 55884f3..7901355 100644
> --- a/test/lisp/net/tramp-tests.el
> +++ b/test/lisp/net/tramp-tests.el
> @@ -2882,16 +2882,16 @@ This tests also `file-readable-p', `file-regular-p'
> and
> ;; able to return the date correctly. They say "don't know".
> (dolist (elt attr)
> (unless
> - (equal
> - (nth
> - 5 (file-attributes (expand-file-name (car elt) tmp-name2)))
> - '(0 0))
> + (zerop
> + (float-time
> + (nth 5 (file-attributes
> + (expand-file-name (car elt) tmp-name2)))))
> (should
> (equal (file-attributes (expand-file-name (car elt) tmp-name2))
> (cdr elt)))))
> (setq attr (directory-files-and-attributes tmp-name2 'full))
> (dolist (elt attr)
> - (unless (equal (nth 5 (file-attributes (car elt))) '(0 0))
> + (unless (zerop (float-time (nth 5 (file-attributes (car elt)))))
> (should
> (equal (file-attributes (car elt)) (cdr elt)))))
> (setq attr (directory-files-and-attributes tmp-name2 nil "^b"))
> @@ -3215,14 +3215,14 @@ This tests also `make-symbolic-link', `file-truename'
> and `add-name-to-file'."
> (write-region "foo" nil tmp-name1)
> (should (file-exists-p tmp-name1))
> (should (consp (nth 5 (file-attributes tmp-name1))))
> - ;; '(0 0) means don't know, and will be replaced by
> - ;; `current-time'. Therefore, we use '(0 1). We skip the
> + ;; A zero timestamp means don't know, and will be replaced by
> + ;; `current-time'. Therefore, use timestamp 1. Skip the
> ;; test, if the remote handler is not able to set the
> ;; correct time.
> (skip-unless (set-file-times tmp-name1 (seconds-to-time 1)))
> ;; Dumb remote shells without perl(1) or stat(1) are not
> ;; able to return the date correctly. They say "don't know".
> - (unless (equal (nth 5 (file-attributes tmp-name1)) '(0 0))
> + (unless (zerop (float-time (nth 5 (file-attributes tmp-name1))))
> (should
> (equal (nth 5 (file-attributes tmp-name1)) (seconds-to-time 1)))
> (write-region "bla" nil tmp-name2)
> @@ -3250,9 +3250,9 @@ This tests also `make-symbolic-link', `file-truename'
> and `add-name-to-file'."
> (with-temp-buffer
> (insert-file-contents tmp-name)
> (should (verify-visited-file-modtime))
> - (set-visited-file-modtime '(0 1))
> + (set-visited-file-modtime (seconds-to-time 1))
> (should (verify-visited-file-modtime))
> - (should (equal (visited-file-modtime) '(0 1 0 0)))))
> + (should (= 1 (float-time (visited-file-modtime))))))
>
> ;; Cleanup.
> (ignore-errors (delete-file tmp-name))))))
In the different tramp*.el files, '(0 0) is explicitly quoted as "don't
know value". This is there for ages.
If you want to change this in the tests, it shall be changed in
tramp*.el as well. Maybe it would be even worth an own constant?
Something like
(defconst time-dont-know (seconds-to-time 0)
"A time value indicating an unknown time.")
If you like, it could even have the value 0 instead of (seconds-to-time
0). But this would also introduce "some assumptions of Lisp code on
timestamp format" - what you try to avoid.
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/25
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Michael Albinus, 2018/09/26
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/27
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/28
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Michael Albinus, 2018/09/28
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/28
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Michael Albinus, 2018/09/29
- Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/28