[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why nnmail-mail-splitting-decodes defaults to nil
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: Why nnmail-mail-splitting-decodes defaults to nil |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:05:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Garreau, Alexandre" <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2018-09-23 at 13:50, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Sep 23 2018, "Garreau, Alexandre" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Le 23/09/2018 à 13h36, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
>>>> My guess would be that it was too slow.
>>>
>>> than now? did it change?
>>
>> It changed when the option was introduced (back in 2002).
>
> Why with this default then? to test it?
Out of caution, most likely. Perhaps unwarranted caution, but certainly
caution.
- #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Garreau\, Alexandre, 2018/09/22
- Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Teemu Likonen, 2018/09/23
- Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Garreau\, Alexandre, 2018/09/23
- Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Andreas Schwab, 2018/09/23
- Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Garreau\, Alexandre, 2018/09/23
- Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header., Andreas Schwab, 2018/09/23
- Why nnmail-mail-splitting-decodes defaults to nil (Was: Re: #<buffer *nntpd*> and split-fancy-:-unparseable base64-encoded header), Garreau\, Alexandre, 2018/09/23
- Re: Why nnmail-mail-splitting-decodes defaults to nil,
Eric Abrahamsen <=