[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?
From: |
Garreau\, Alexandre |
Subject: |
Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27? |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2018 17:42:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (5.13), GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
On 2018-10-06 at 14:57, Drew Adams wrote:
> My point was only that use of `foo foo' (with a no-break
> space between the two foo's) as a mistake/typo for an
> intended `foo foo' (with a normal space) should not be
> signaled by Lisp as an error. But the no-break space could
> be highlighted as sometimes helpful info. `foo foo' (with
> no-break space) is just a symbol, for Lisp - not a syntax
> error.
Unbreakable space is already colored as some sort of colored underscore.
The problem is there are a bunch of other kind of spaces, though I
personally only use unbreakable, non-justifying and/or “fine” (dunno if
it match an en space) space in French, though I do it commonly in
strings with emacs (which only correctly highlight the normal
unbreakable space, but not the others). I’d like to see these
highlighted (perhaps, or even preferably, a different way) as well, or
should it be something customizable according user preferences (or
language?).
> E.g. (changing the example):
>
> (let (foo foo)...) binds symbol `foo foo' (with a no-break
> space) to nil. It doesn't bind symbol `foo' to the current
> value of symbol `foo'.
I would have expected it to bind twice foo to nil (or to signal an error
or a warning), yet it seems you used a normal space, unbreakable-space
already highlights in emacs, so I’d noticed it.
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Noam Postavsky, 2018/10/04
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/04
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/05
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/05
- RE: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Drew Adams, 2018/10/05
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Alan Mackenzie, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/10/06
- RE: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Drew Adams, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?,
Garreau\, Alexandre <=
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06
- RE: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Drew Adams, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Richard Stallman, 2018/10/07
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/06
- Re: Change of Lisp syntax for "fancy" quotes in Emacs 27?, Paul Eggert, 2018/10/06