[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:29:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The only thing that's slightly putting me off is flymake.el's
> requirement of lisp/progmodes/flymake-proc.el _after_ the `provide`
> statement. It's odd, but shouldn't be a problem, right?
It's sub-optimal, but sometimes it's better then the other options.
In any case I don't see why it should be a problem for GNU ELPA packaging.
> So, if no-one opposes I will be commiting this in the near future:
No objection on my side,
Stefan
- OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, João Távora, 2018/12/03
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, João Távora, 2018/12/05
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/12/05
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, João Távora, 2018/12/06
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/12/06
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, João Távora, 2018/12/06
- Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/12/06