Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 55ec674: * lisp/multifile.el: New file, extracted from etags.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> Indeed.  My conclusion from this discussion is that multifile.el should
>>> not accrue commands like those of project.el: it's a library that can be
>>> used by things like tags.el or project.el, with a limited scope.
>>
>> I agree with that. But still, I'm very tempted to rename project-search to
>> fileloop-find-regexp-in-project and project-query-replace to
>> fileloop-query-replace-regexp-in-project.
>
> So... which of these changes do you prefer?
>
> Inserting -fileloop- to the names of he commands, or moving them to the
> fileloop package altogether?

As quoted above, I think multifile.el (or whatever it is renamed to)
should stay as an Elisp library, and commands built on it
belong elsewhere.

So I'd prefer if we just add "-<foo>" to the name of the commands.


        Stefan