[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: xr
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: xr |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:10:54 +0100 |
27 feb. 2019 kl. 18.09 skrev Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>:
>
> Then maybe at least define several settings somewhere and make them
> available to be used as argument or replacement list or whatever. It
> would be good if it was possible to get a different behavior without too
> much brain usage: Make it so that the calls needed can be kept short.
That's probably a good idea; the optional argument could be either an alist or
a symbol like 'short or 'verbose.
Good defaults are just as important. I thought that one-or-more would be more
descriptive than + or 1+ for those not familiar with the rx notation, but
perhaps this was a mistake.
Which would you prefer as default symbol from each of these sets?
one-or-more 1+ +
zero-or-more 0+ *
zero-or-one optional opt ?
repeat ** (for lower-upper-bounded repetition)
repeat = (for exact-count repetition)
any char in
not-newline nonl
group submatch
line-start bol
line-end eol
string-start buffer-start bos bot
string-end buffer-end eos eot
word-start bow
word-end eow
sequence seq and :
or |
regexp regex
Re: [ELPA] New package: xr, Michael Heerdegen, 2019/02/27