Re: [PATCH 2/3] Don't print "process finished" into the stderr buffer.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 16:57:12 -0400
> 
> > But Emacs does that for ages, so in Emacs this is veteran behavior of
> > the default sentinel function.
> 
> FWIW, I don't much like this behavior and since the stderr case is new
> I think we don't have to inherit this part of the behavior.

By "this behavior" do you mean only the "normal" case, or also the
abnormal termination case, in which case we show the reason of the
abnormal termination?

Philipp's proposal, AFAIU, would remove the notification for stderr
even in the abnormal case, so we will have to rely on the stdout
sentinel to announce the reason.  Are we sure no information will be
lost through this assumption, i.e. are we sure both sentinels will
always make the same announcements?