[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image transformations
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Image transformations |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:57:16 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:57:21 -0400
>
> > I think this would be a wasted effort. There's no need to make all
> > the implementations use the same matrix, unless they all assign the
> > same semantics to the matrix -- which doesn't appear to be the case,
> > at least not as far as this discussion shows.
>
> There's one case where this would make sense: if we decide to let Elisp
> provide such a matrix.
Why would providing a matrix interface be a good idea? I think an
interface based on attributes (:crop, :rotation, etc.) is much cleaner
and easier to use. We can always add more attributes (like :shear) if
we want.
What am I missing?
- Re: Image transformations, (continued)
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/13
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Image transformations, Richard Copley, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Richard Copley, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Yuri Khan, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Richard Copley, 2019/06/14
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/15
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/15
- Re: Image transformations, Alan Third, 2019/06/15
- Re: Image transformations, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/15