[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2019 18:01:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> And if one is developing a large package that one also uses all the
> time, it would be even nicer if it just went ahead and reloaded the
> file,
At the time when we realize that we need to load the bytecode, we could
indeed reload the file, but we'd still be in the middle of trying to run
the bytecode of a function from the old file and we wouldn't know which
function this is (we only have at hand the byte-code-function-p object,
not the corresponding symbol) so we wouldn't know how to redirect the
call to the newly loaded version of the function.
Stefan
- Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/15
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/15
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Richard Stallman, 2019/06/15
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/16
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/16
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Richard Stallman, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Paul Eggert, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/17
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/18
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/18
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/18