[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:09:22 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> In any case, I think deprecating byte-compile-dynamic is a better
> solution than trying to fix its many shortcomings, since I don't know of
> any concrete evidence that it has any real benefit.
Maybe you are right. I think byte-compile-dynamic was meant to reduce the
memory size of Emacs, and that is less important now than it was.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, (continued)
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/19
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/19
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, T.V Raman, 2019/06/21
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/21
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/21
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff, Richard Stallman, 2019/06/17