[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: encode-time vs decode-time

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: encode-time vs decode-time
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 11:16:33 +0300

> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:54:07 -0700
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> The POSIX tradition is to call these timestamps "broken-down time", and that 
> is 
> what glibc calls them too. How about if we use that name instead? It would 
> help 
> to be more consistent with other GNU code.

"Broken-down time" will replace "decoded time", I presume?  I think
I'm okay with that, but what will we use instead of "encoded time"

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]