[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2019 08:35:04 +0200 |
> From: João Távora <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:43:00 +0000
>
> >> So I'm proposing "completion-emphasis", which we seem to agree
> >> on
> >
> > Not really, no.
>
> Why didn't you object to it 1..2..six mails ago? You just said
> "secondary-emphasis" is not a good name... This makes us go in circles,
> Eli.
Sorry, I don't always have time to catch up with huge threads, and in
this particular case had difficulties to understand what were the main
issues.
> One more time: my only goal in this entire giant conversation, is for
> the 'flex' style to be able to transform this match on the pattern "foo":
>
> fabrobazor
> ^
> `- this letter is bold by default currently
>
> into this:
>
> fabrobazor
> ^ ^ ^
> `---`---`----- I want these bold by default in the future
>
> no change to the 'basic/prefix' completion.
I understand that you want to highlight both f, o, o, and r, but the
latter with a different face. If my understanding is incorrect, then
what will the other face be used for?
> Otherwise, if you do, then the only completion-related face that
> currently has "bold" is completions-first-difference, which is a silly
> name for this. Should I alias that to "completions-match-emphasis",
> your 3-mails-ago suggestion? To something else?
I understand that what I called completions-match-emphasis will
highlight f, o, and o -- the characters that were in the string typed
by the user. These are currently not highlighted at all. I also
understand that there will be another face, the one we currently call
completions-first-difference (and you want another name for it), which
will highlight r in this example.
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, (continued)
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/07
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/11/08
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/08