[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Criticism of jit-lock--antiblink-post-command
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Criticism of jit-lock--antiblink-post-command |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:45:46 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: João Távora <address@hidden>, Eli
> Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:51:04 -0500
>
> > These are good reasons for making antiblink easy to disable.
>
> The intention is that when it's not useful it's harmless.
> IOW if there's a good reason to turn it off, it's probably a bug.
I don't think I agree. A post-command-hook that is not useful just
takes CPU cycles, and likewise a timer which does nothing when its
function is invoked.
And in any case, a feature that changes behavior should have a knob to
disable it.