[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:17:46 +0200 |
> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:25:28 +0100
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> Would providing a defcustom be such a hardship?
Given that "enlarging the limit is a bad idea", I'm not even sure we
should provide a variable. We definitely shouldn't document it.
- Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Dima Kogan, 2020/03/10
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/03/10
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Dima Kogan, 2020/03/10
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Dima Kogan, 2020/03/22
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Robert Pluim, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Robert Pluim, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Dima Kogan, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/03/23
Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/03/11