Re: Using incremental parsing in Emacs (via: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > Maybe those grammars could be compiled to some other representation (I
>> > don't know if it is made mostly of data-tables or actual code or what)?
>> IMO ideally should be lisp and we should leverage the native compiler
>> for that, but I understand we are not there.
> FWIW, it should indeed be possible to develop the grammars in Lisp,
> but that is not the first goal in bringing such a package to Emacs.

I'm not interested in changing the way grammars are *written*.
I'm proposing investigating if the tree-sitter run-time library can be
made to read an OS-and-architecture-neutral representation of
the grammar.


        Stefan