Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs)

[Yuan Fu]

On Mar 30, 2020, at 11:06 AM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:

If they needed to be informed of the change but
`inhibit-modification-hooks` prevented it, it's a bug.
Please report it.

Do you mean it’s a bug in eglot/lsp-mode or it’s a bug in inhibit-modification-hooks (or the code who set it to t)?

Why not simply pass to tree-sitter the chunk that jit-lock is about to
fontify?

Incremental parsing seems to be the preferred way to use tree-sitter—maintaining a syntax tree on the fly and later query for information from it.

Yuan