[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using increm
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:09:34 +0200 |
>>>>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:00:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:11:07 +0200
>> Cc: emacs-devel <address@hidden>
>>
Stephen> I don't understand what the alternative is. The parser imposes the
Stephen> reasonable requirement that the input text be utf-8 (or possibly
some
Stephen> other standard format). Emacs raw buffer text is not utf-8, so we
must
Stephen> do some encoding.
>>
>> Itʼs pretty close, apart from raw bytes.
Eli> Not only raw bytes: also some characters that cannot be unified with
Eli> Unicode.
And again: how likely are those characters to be in source code?
Robert
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), (continued)
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Tuấn-Anh Nguyễn, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/02
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/02
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Robert Pluim, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs),
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), John Yates, 2020/04/03
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Tuấn-Anh Nguyễn, 2020/04/02
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/02
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Stephen Leake, 2020/04/03
- Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/03