[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDI+ take 3
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GDI+ take 3 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:55:18 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 01:49:46 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> #3 0x00000004002b0dc9 in w32_frame_delay (pBitmap=pBitmap@entry=0x5d622f0,
> frame=frame@entry=0) at w32image.c:260
> 260 delay = decode_delay (propertyItem, frame);
> (gdb) p frame
> $1 = 0
> (gdb) p propertyItem[0]
> $3 = {
> id = 2880154539,
> length = 2880154539,
> type = 43947,
> value = 0xfeeefeeefeeefeee
> }
So I guess instead of crashing, we should in such cases log an error
message and pretend the image has only one frame/page?
Thanks.
- Re: GDI+ take 3, (continued)
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/16
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/16
- Re: GDI+ take 3,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/17
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/17
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/17
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juanma Barranquero, 2020/04/18
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/18