[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:34:55 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Those space considerations are no longer significant. But there may
> > be another problem: whether there is room in the representation of
> > Lisp_Object for another type.
> We do know the answer to this question, since XEmacs has had a separate
> character type since even before it was renamed to XEmacs.
> Basically: you make the room for it.
That would be an answer about the general design approach, but the
question I posed is about the current format of Lisp_Object.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/28