|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: [ELPA] New package: transient |
Date: | Mon, 4 May 2020 03:04:13 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 03.05.2020 21:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc:address@hidden,address@hidden,address@hidden, address@hidden From: Dmitry Gutov<address@hidden> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 20:42:52 +0300 Regardless of whether I regularly use the manual or not, it's not okay to dismiss subpar code completion experience just because we have separate commands that also do a more free-form search.Once again: I don't dismiss it, I'm trying to show that it's sub-optimal for some jobs, in particular for discovery.
It's generally the fastest way available (especially since with automatic code completion, it's often a side-effect of typing).
If the user tries it and it doesn't give a good result, they move on to the next one. But if we improve the percentage where the first one gives good results, it's an overall win in usability.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |