[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Ema
From: |
조성빈 |
Subject: |
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 May 2020 16:17:39 +0900 |
> 2020. 5. 7. 오후 12:34, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> 작성:
>
>> It is not terrible lot of work for people to deal with those issues,
>> but I wouldn't assume a simple program can.
>
> The better option is to stop requiring copyright paperwork.
> It is harmful to the Emacs project.
Thank you so much for saying this, it’s actively harmful and really the only
reason why MELPA is a thing.
> Stefan
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Phillip Lord, 2020/05/05
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?,
조성빈 <=
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, tomas, 2020/05/07
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/07
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/07
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/07
- Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/08