Re: Questions about throw-on-input

[Ivan Yonchovski]

Hi Stefan,

Thank you for the reply.

>
> Why do you do that instead of using `while-no-input`?
>

No particular reason. I think that it the end I will end up with
`while-no-input`.

> You mean the event is "eaten"?  I must say I'm not sure why.

I got the answer from Eli.

>
> That's because timers are run with `inhibit-quit` which interferes.
> `while-no-input` would take care of that.
>

Yes, I didn't know that.


Thanks,
Ivan