[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Ema
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2020 11:16:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 13/05/2020 11.00, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden
>> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 00:22:56 -0400
>>
>> Maybe we can publicize a part of the list which would not violate privacy?
>> When I signed my copyright papers, I answered yes to a question that said
>> "Would it be acceptable for us to publicize your contribution by
>> microblogging that you are contributing, and listing your name in our
>> monthly newsletter?". I think it is safe to assume that those who answered
>> yes to this question do not object to appearing on a public list; correct?
>
> If you suggest making public a part of the entries in the list, then
> this would be worse than not publishing it at all, I think.
>
> If you suggest publishing part of the _data_ in each entry, then this
> should work in principle, but (a) "Someone" needs to do the work of
> setting this up
I've sent an implementation ^^ I'm happy to write the code if code is needed,
it's the specs that I don't know :)
> and (b) even in this case there might be issues which
> need to be resolved. For example, some people need to submit
> disclaimers from their employers, in addition to their personal
> assignment, but publishing that part discloses their employment, which
> may be invading their privacy.
I think an API could say "yes", "no", or "check with maintainer".
We can put all tricky cases in the "check with maintainer" category.
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Robert Pluim, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Alan Third, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/12
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Copyright assignment checking by PGP-signed commits (WAS: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?), Noam Postavsky, 2020/05/13
- Re: Copyright assignment checking by PGP-signed commits (WAS: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?), Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13