Re: 31395511: "Don’t attempt to modify constant strings"

[Paul Eggert]

On 6/3/20 3:52 PM, Pip Cet wrote:
> All it does is replace a
> six-argument setq by two successive setqs? Surely the symbol value is
> irrelevant for the first, third, etc. argument to setq, so what
> difference does it make?

Oh, you're right, I misread the setqs.  (I sure do dislike setqs with more than
2 args....). So all my patch did was make the source code closer to emacs-27.

Instead, João should listen to the email you sent.