[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Oct 2020 20:59:58 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:09:35 -0400
>
> > In my remote corner of the world, I sometimes have periods of time
> > that Internet crawls at 3KB/sec.
>
> That sounds equivalent to the default value of `baud-rate` (19200).
No, because when this happens, packets get lost. Otherwise, how could
a fast connection suddenly become so slow?
> > If I need to use Emacs on a remote machine during that time, this
> > "obsolete" mode is very useful, because SSH sends more than just the
> > characters I type.
>
> What do you mean by "mode", exactly?
> Do you mean you (setq baud-rate 2400)?
No, I mean isearch-slow-terminal-mode.
Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s?, Jean Louis, 2020/10/23
Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/10/23