Re: emacs for pure Gtk3

[Yuuki Harano]

Hi,

I and Jeff have done the copyright assignment.

Jeff rebased the pgtk branch.
We are going to push his one to fsf's repository.  It is:
  https://github.com/fejfighter/emacs#branch=upstream-base
My pgtk branch contains too many merge commits, but his one doesn't.
Both branches contain the same contents.

I want to push his one to fsf's repository.  How to do it?
Can I get an account of the repository here?:
https://savannah.gnu.org/account/register.php

-- 
Yuuki Harano


On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:01:33 +0300,
        Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:56:04 +0900 (JST)
>> From: Yuuki Harano <masm+emacs@masm11.me>
>> 
>> You may know, I ported emacs for pure Gtk3, especially for wayland native.
>> 
>> https://github.com/masm11/emacs
>> 
>> I created a new window-system, pgtk, which doesn't use libX11 directly.
>> 
>> What do you think? I want to merge to mainline.
> 
> Thank you for your interest in Emacs, and in particular for working on
> this.
> 
> I think this should be pushed to a feature branch first, and we should
> then let people use it and report any problems, with the purpose of
> making it stable enough before we merge to master.
> 
> But before we create such a feature branch, there are a few
> prerequisites:
> 
>   . You don't seem to have a copyright assignment on file.  This would
>     be a significant contribution to Emacs, for which we must have
>     such an assignment from you before bringing this code into the
>     Emacs repository.  Would you be willing to start the legal
>     paperwork now?  If so, I will send you the form to fill.
> 
>   . The code seem to be based on an relatively old version of our
>     master branch, which makes it hard to review (there are many
>     spurious changes unrelated to your work).  Please rebase on the
>     latest HEAD of the master branch.
> 
>   . Would it be possible for you to describe the design of this
>     feature, and how that affects the various Emacs features, so that
>     understanding the changes would be facilitated?  In particular,
>     can this new window-system live together with X and TTY frames in
>     the same session? does it support Lisp threads? etc.  Also, what
>     are the requirements from the platforms where this could be built
>     and used?
> 
> Thanks again for your work on Emacs.