RE: thunk.el: Document that thunk-force == funcall?

[Nicolas Petton]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> I have encountered this requirement several times (and using `thunk-
>> let' was not always the solution) - thus my question.

> FWIW, that makes sense to me.  Why not tell users this?
> It's fine to have an abstraction, but in Lisp it can
> help to know the implementation, especially in a
> straightforward case like this.

Indeed, I agree.

Cheers,
Nico

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature