[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2020 23:32:56 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Then those packages where words "Free Software Foundation" do not
> exist:
There is no need for a package in NonGNU ELPA to have those words in it,
as far as I can see. Does anyone see why that should be required?
> 0x0-20201014.1445.el
> - public domain CC0 1.0 questionable if free in other countries but
> US
CC0 is ok.
> aggressive-fill-paragraph-20181106.1354.el
> - no license
That is nonfree software -- not ok.
> alan-mode-20200723.1405.el
> - MIT
That is vague; it should specify the license.
> anaphora-20180618.2200.el
> - public domain, in other countries can be proprietary by default
That is a problem.
> anki-mode-20200703.739.el
> - no license, proprietary by default
Right, that is no good.
I can't draw much in the way of conclusions from your report
since you have not said how you got this list of packages that
you are searching through.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/09
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Thibaut Verron, 2020/12/09
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/10
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Thibaut Verron, 2020/12/10
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Kangas, 2020/12/10
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Thibaut Verron, 2020/12/10
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/10
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/11
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/10