[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:01:40 -0500 |
> "is NOT part of GNU Emacs.",
GNU ELPA is both part and not-part of Emacs, AFAIC, so I'm fine
with that.
I don't understand, it cannot be both or neither. Either it is part
of Emacs, or it is not.
> is copyrighted by the FSF but Artur Malabarba who is the author of
> this package has no entry in the copyright.list?
He sure does (with a few more names between Artur and Malabarba).
Ah, I only searched on the email and name. Thank you for the
correction.
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, (continued)
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Tim Cross, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Andrea Corallo, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Tim Cross, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Tim Cross, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Tim Cross, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/15
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stephen Leake, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Vasilij Schneidermann, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Tim Cross, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/12