[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named-let
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
Re: named-let |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:50:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> As a side note I think we could have full TCO in Emacs, but at the cost
>> of a relatively invasive patch and a some (probably small but hard
>> to quantify a priori) performance regression. Not sure it is
>> sufficiently important to justify that.
>
> That's the question, indeed.
> Also, I have the impression that "full TCO" could be difficult if we
> consider the mixed case where a compiled function calls an interpreted
> function and vice-versa.
I might be wrong but I think should be possible to harmonize both sides
with not much problems (other than the mentioned enormous codebase
diff).
But anyway, I've no time to prove I'm right or wrong on this :/
Andrea
- Re: named-let, (continued)
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/10
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let,
Andrea Corallo <=
- Re: named-let, Helmut Eller, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/13
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/13
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/20