[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:50:43 +0200 |
> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:56:35 -0800
>
> > We had this discussion in December, and I think at least some aspects
> > were agreed upon; one of them is that using Git submodules is probably
> > the best alternative. Why don't we pick up where that discussion has
> > left off, instead of starting it all anew?
>
> I did not realize that was a decision.
It wasn't. But several people agreed and no one objected. So I think
we have a consensus there.
- policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/20
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/21
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/22
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/23
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/24
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/24
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Andy Moreton, 2021/01/25