[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:30:22 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:14:26 -0500
>
> >> git submodule add -b elpa/ada-mode .../emacs.git where/I/want/to/put/it
> >
> > AFAIU, "add -b" names a branch in the repository _from_which_ we add
> > (i.e. the upstream), which in this case is elpa.git.
>
> Read again: there's no "elpa.git" in the command above.
Please humor me with a more detailed response. This is confusing
enough without extra riddles.
If elpa.git is not in the frame, then how did elpa/ada-mode wind up in
emacs.git?
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, (continued)
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/24
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Andy Moreton, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27