[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current mode command discovery
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Current mode command discovery |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Feb 2021 23:07:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 10:39:10PM +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
>
> >> Listing the irrelevant commands would only serve to confuse and overload
> >> the user.
> >
> > For the way I use M-x, I absolutely need what you call "irrelevant"
> > commands. Suggesting that these "confuse and overload" me is not a nice
> > thing to do.
>
> How often do you need to consult a command about foo-mode while working
> on a buffer with baz-mode ?
Sorry. I think I'm out of this discussion. I very much hope there's
a way to opt out of that filtering, if it is ever implemented.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Current mode command discovery, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery,
tomas <=
RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
RE: [External] : Re: Current mode command discovery, Drew Adams, 2021/02/14
Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/14