[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:31:57 +0000 |
Hello, Drew.
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 23:48:31 +0000, Drew Adams wrote:
> > I spent some time boring into the doc string and the description in the
> > Elisp manual. The only conclusion I could come to was that C-] is
> > meant to abort EXACTLY ONE level.
> Apologies for chiming in without following
> the thread.
> I just want to say that my use of recursive
> minibuffers depends on being able to use a
> key (preferably `C-]', as always previously)
> to abort a single level (i.e., exactly one).
> ___
> I also have a command, `icicle-top-level',
> bound to `C-M-T' (aka `C-M-S-t'), which aborts
> to the top-level whenever possible. Doc string:
> Remove `*Completions*' window. Return to top level.
> Try to throw to `icicle-top-level' (`catch' is for multi-commands).
> If that fails, call `top-level'.
I've just posted another patch in this area.
There's no intention that the functionality of C-] should be changed. I
see no reason why your C-M-T should not carry on working. However, if
you feel like testing these things, I'd be grateful! Thanks!
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [External] : Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!,
Alan Mackenzie <=