[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs development...
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs development... |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2021 12:25:07 +1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.4; emacs 27.2.50 |
Jean-Christophe Helary <lists@traduction-libre.org> writes:
>
> mark for upgrade with U
> filter on marked with / m
> remove the filter with / /
> the marks for upgrade are gone.
>
> generally speaking / / will remove any mark, not just upgrade ones. I guess
> the
> fact that this bug has remained in the code for so longs says something about
> how often the filter feature is used.
>
Yes, I never use it :-).
I guess I'd probably classify this as a specification bug rather than a
more fundamental bug. Exactly what / / clears needs to be clarified. Is
there a use case where you would actually want the upgrade marks removed
as well? Perhaps the simplicity of clearing all marks and then just
running package-refresh-contents to get back the list of packages which
can be upgraded is a justifiable approach which keeps the filter removal
function less complex and therefore less error prone?
It could be nobody has reported this as a bug because they don't
consider it to be a bug. There doesn't seem to be anything in the
documentation which would make me expect upgrade marks would not be
removed, so I would probably consider what you are proposing as a
feature enhancement rather than a bug fix. Then again, as I stated, I
don't use this function, so really don't have any skin in the game.
- Re: Emacs development..., (continued)
- Re: Emacs development..., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Arthur Miller, 2021/08/21
- RE: [External] : Re: Emacs development..., Drew Adams, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Stephen Berman, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Konstantin Kharlamov, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Tim Cross, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Tim Cross, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development...,
Tim Cross <=
- Re: Emacs development..., Arthur Miller, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Tim Cross, 2021/08/21
- Re: Emacs development..., Arthur Miller, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Tim Cross, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., T.V Raman, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Eric Abrahamsen, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Eric Abrahamsen, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Arthur Miller, 2021/08/22
- Re: Emacs development..., Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/22