Re: Emacs development...

[Arthur Miller]

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:
>
>> Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>
>> In addition to all you say below re IELM, the nugget of gold that makes
>> it invaluable is its ability to  set the eval context buffer while
>> remaining in the ielm buffer, see command bound to C-c b.
I see to missed that one. Yes that sounds useful.

> Hey, that's great! I'd also been on the fence about the value of IELM
> over the plain old *scratch* buffer, and that's a real advantage.
No, scratch buffer is not an alternative for development, in my opinion.