[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab Migration
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab Migration |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:51:26 +0300 |
> From: dick <dick.r.chiang@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:38:44 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, danflscr@gmail.com, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
>
> * Newcomer suggests PR-based workflow citing youth. Check.
>
> * Veterans chime in, citing the obvious reasons-for and the
> political reasons-against. Check.
>
> * EZ cites his *sui generis* argument that a web-based workflow is actually
> *more* work than mailing patches around. Check.
>
> * Someone announces his intention to begin the necessary work. Check.
>
> * Someone remarks how discussion on emacs-devel repeats itself. Now checked.
What's the alternative? tell that "newcomer" we've been there and
please go away? That's unkind and unbecoming.
Besides, there's always hope that this time someone will actually do
the job. It did happen in the past.
- Gitlab Migration, Daniel Fleischer, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, dick, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Gitlab Migration, tomas, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, dick, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, tomas, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/27
Re: Gitlab Migration, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/26
Re: Gitlab Migration, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/08/26