emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gitlab Migration


From: Yuchen Pei
Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:12:36 +1000
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.2


Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:59:20 -0400
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org

notabug.org and sr.ht are considerably better, by our ethical
evaluation standards.

Would someone please evaluate notabug.org wrt our expectations, and
post a summary?  TIA.

There was already some evaluation:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00052.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00036.html
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Notabug

Not sure if it was conclusive though.

--
Best,
Yuchen

PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
          <https://ypei.me/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]